Protected natural monument "Pukanec
black mulberry trees"
Morus nigra, origin,
botanical charakteristics, distribution, cultivating conditions,
utilization
Black Mulberry (Morus nigra L) is a tree reaching the height
up to 8m. It has compact, spherical, broadly diffused (8 to
10m) crown. The mentioned crown form so typical for this species
is maintained in mature trees till age of 100 to 120 years.
After wards they often are spitted along the whole trunk due
to the weight of big lateral branches. However the tree does
not die and continues to live with such opened wounds. The branches
which have sunk down to the earth root after the years and new
individuals, more or less distant of original trunk, arise from
them. There are cases that a group of 4 to 5 trees has origined
from the splited tree. In that way over centuries the appearance
of black mulberry trees has been changing. In many cases only
residues have been maintained from the original trees which
however continue in living and rich fruiting. It happens very
often that after cutting down the tree vigorous sprouts grow
from the stump to save the tree before dying. Current shoots
are relatively thick, short, yellowish-grey brown, pubescens
and densely grown. Buds are ovate-conical, acuminate, with brown
bracts 5 to 7mm long.
Leaves are simple, little variable as a rule and only on
sprouts irregularly lobed, alternate, on the dorsal side dark
green, rough, pubescens, on the ventral side lighter, paper-leathery
relatively hard, petiole 10 to 15mm long. Leaf blade is broad
- ovate, 100 to 150mm long, 100 to 120mm wide with cordate
base and shortly acuminate apex. The leaf margin is crenulate
dentate (crenate dentatus) (Kavina, 1951). Flushing of leaves
begins as a rule in the second half of May, so compared with
other woody plants much later. This fact was noticed already
by ancient Romans when Plinius named this mulberry as "sapientissima
arborum" (the wisest of all trees).
Nearly simultaneously with leaves development also unisexual,
monoecious flowers composed to headform spikes begin to break.
Male flowers bear 4 stamens and are diffused among female
ones which consist of upper ovarium with two styles bearing
shortly pubescens stigmata. After pollination (by wind or
insects) and fertilization, petals of female flowers become
fleshy, enclose wholly ovate key fruit and all inflorescence
turns to the known composed fruit - mulberry (sorosus) - 35
mm x 20 mm, significantly cylindrical with short petioles.
On unsufficiently nourished branches fruits are smaller and
more spherical. Light - green colour of young fruit transforms
in course of development to light-pink, later to dark red
and in full ripeness to dark purple. Fruits ripe gradually
from mid - July to September. Red fruits are very acidic but
during ripening acid concentration decreases and in full ripeness
the fruit is sweet and only slightly acidic with characteristic
flavour and high content of bloody coloured juice. Fruits
are easily to separate from shoots only in the full ripen
state.
The wood of black mulberry is circularly porate with the yellow-brown
core and yellowish young wood. Annual rings are clearly visible
with thicker layer of late wood and thinner layer of spring
wood. Pith rays are distinguishable with the naked eye. Pith
is relatively thick. Vessels are circular on transversal section.
In primary bark and in floem latex-vessels take place. The
wood is relatively hard, medium heavy, very bad splitable,
tough, on longitude sections shiny and very durable. Evidence
of this are died and untreated parts of trees which neither
over decades succumb to rot and their wood remains still hard
and firm. On died wood no wood destroying fungi, no pests
either no holes after woodpecker have been found. The wood
of black mulberry is heavier and more durable than wood of
white mulberry. Microscopical structure of both species is
the same. On the first look the mulberry wood is very similar
to acacia wood. The grey bark of young trunks becomes thick
relatively fast (up to 20 mm) and forms thick, longitudinally
dissected suberized bark. The bark of roots is orange - yellow.
Roots with their length considerably exceed circumference
of the crown (Balabán, 1955).
The origin of black mulberry is unknown as Iran being sometimes
reported has not been proved. Zelený and Grünerova (1982)
have stated that it has been largely grown in West Asia (although
very often West Asia has been taken for its native hand) in
northern part of Arabian peninsula (Lebanon, Jordan, Syria)
in Afghanistan, Iran, Middle Asia and in Caucasus. Domin (1948)
has reported that black mulberry grows wildly evidently in
south part of Trans-Caucasus e.q. Carabakh, Talysh but in
the remaining part of Caucasus region is only rare (?). Kolesnikov
(1960) has reported about it only like about cultivated woody
plant namely on Caucasus, the Crimea, Middle Asia, rarely
in the Ukraine and in some botanical gardens (Odessa, Kiev,
Lvov other). However in Odessa during cold winters has been
killed by frosts. Some data on black mulberry in China have
been probably false as it is not known that this species has
been grown in China. The black Chinese mulberries, taken for
M. nigra, are probably red - fruit forms of white mulberry.
As early as in antiquity black mulberry had moved from its
mother land to Greece and from here to all Mediterranean area.
In antique it was well known, as Teophrastos, Plinius, Horácius,
Vergitius and Columella had reported on it. Hence, name Morus
relates always only lo black mulberry, as white mulberry started
to be cultivated in South Europe in about the 12th century
and in Middle Europe only since middle of the 16-th century.
Red mulberry (Morus rubra) native to Northern America has
been reportedly grown in Europe since 1629 (Klika, 1947).
Probably from Italy black mulberry got to southern and northern
part of Germany. Its main disseminators were monks, who reported
about it as a medicinal plant. As early as in the 5th century
the mulberry vine "moretum" was known on territory
of Germany. In 1912 Geisenheimer described a tree of black
mulberry from the west part of Germany, which "lies"
and which, people say about it, is at age of 1000. Although
this age was exaggerated it surely had been yet in that time
a very old tree. The same author reported that black mulberry
occurred in Germany-Rhone, in Harz mountains, in littoral
regions on Helgoland island.
By Kovalovský (1960) it grows yet under temperate climate
of southern Sweden and isolately in Switzerland. Its occurrence
in South-European countries (Greece, Italy, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia)
is limited; in Hungary and Germany is rather scarce. In Poland
is unknown, Pilát (1953) has reported this species was introduced
in our country from West Asia in 1548.
Occurrence in former Czechoslovakia in west Slovakia it commences
with isolated trees in surroundings of Nové Mesto nad Váhom
and continues over large interspaces, with warm exposures
of Small Carpathian Mountains where within the land register
of village Dolné Orešany, on grounds of former vineyard, by
Kovalovský about 50 very old trees still in 1960 have grown.
This region continues through Častá, Modra up to Bratislava
and Skalica. Middle Slovakia region commences with isolated
trees in surroundings of Modrý Kameň and continues through
Krupina, Bátovce, Jabloňovce, Bohunice, Pukanec, Devičany,
Nová Dedina, Čajkov, Rybník, Levice, Hronský Beňadik, Zlaté
Moravce, Vráble, hill - side of Zobor by Nitra and ends with
several trees near Hlohovec. Isolately it occurrences also
in neighbourhood of Štúrovo and probably in vine - regions
of east Slovakia (Zelený and Grünerová, 1982). However reliable
proofs on its occurrence in east Slovakia are missing.
In Moravia, black mulberry grows only in the warmest regions
namely in villages Bohutice, Miroslav, Vnorovy, Orechov, Žeravice,
Kounice, Styrovín, Újezd, Hostějov, Dobromilice, Sokolnice
a Židlochovice (Zelený and Grünerová, 1982).
In Czech country it grows in the surroundings of Prague -
Brezhany u Zbraslavi, in Czech Central Montains at Raná u
Loun (here it grew a tree 7 meters high with circumference
2.9m which died due to frost damage in 70s), Miřejovice, Litoměrice,
Velké Žernoseky, along Ohře river valley in Červený Hrádek
by Chomutov, Chomutov (Zelený and Grünerová, 1982).
The richest locality at all on the territory of former Czechoslovakia
is the landregister of town Pukanec, where on the south slopes
of Štiavnica Montains, by counting in 1986, 460 yielding trees
grow. Trees growing in own town estimated for 40 to 50 individuals
were not involved into the total number. Majority of trees
is at the age of 100 to 350, although some individuals for
their mighty growth would demand a higher estimate.
| Morus nigra L. |
2n = c 304
Ref. 2n = 308 |
Uhríková and Májovský 1984 subsp. lrnaviensis Domin:
localization Malé Karpaty, Myslenice, Jur by Bratislavu,
Leg. Strelka
(10 ref.) cf. Bolkhovskikh et al. 1969, 2n = ca 308 Agaev
and Fedorova 1970
|
| Morus alba L. |
2n = 28
Ref. 2n = 28 |
Uhríková and Májovský in Löve 1980, localization Malé
Karpaty, Mlynská dolina, Leg. Májovský
(10 ref.) cf. Bolkliovskikh et al. 1969, Agaev and Fedorova
1970, Sharma 1970, Hans, 1972, 2n = 14 Mehra and Gill
1974
|
| Morus rubra L. |
Ref. 2n = 28 |
Janaki Ammal 1984 |
Majority of black mulberry trees grown within Pukanec territory
take place in cultivated vineyards, eventually in former vineyards
and only minority in home gardens and yards within territory
of town. Locality is situated at an elevation of 330 to 480m,
on slopes exposed to south, south - west and south - east.
Black mulberry has similar climate demands as apricot.
Winter frosts damage it only in case, when temperature drops
to -25°C and more. During severe winter of 1928 -1929 in range
of one month reached air temperature in Pukanec -30°C. However
only young trees in overfertilizated soils of gardens succumbed
to frost killing while on trees grown in poor soils of vineyards
only young shoots frosted. During winter 1955 - 1956 there
was in Pukanec recorded temperature -26 C and on mulberries
only flower - buds frosted, so in that year there was no fruit
yield. A fall of temperatures to -20°C up to -22°C during
January and February of 1985 did not cause any injury of mulberries
as in that year a good fruit yield was recorded.
Pukanec area of black mulberry can be ranked to warm climatic
region, warm, mild humid district, with mild winter. Average
year temperature is +8 °C to +9 °C, average temperature in
vegetation period is +16°C. Temperatures of the coldest months
(January, February) only rarely overtop -20°C, while summer
temperatures very often reaches 34°C to 35°C. Average sum
of year precipitations is 681mm, in vegetation period 300
- 350mm. Snow cover lasts in average for 75 days and its mean
thickness reaches the highest value in February, namely 80-120mm.
In December and March there are relatively few days with snow
cover (Kolektív, 1958). Flowers injury with late frosts were
not observed as well as frosting of current shoots due to
early frosts, which come in this region very late and current
shoots lignificate in time. Within territory of Pukanec black
mulberry grows on poor soils which are often stony, rather
permeable and dry, shallow to average depth. Andezites and
especially propyliritate andezites (SW - part of vineyards),
which form geological basis of Pukanec region, have been,
from the chemical point of view, ranked to the group of siliceous
minerals without calcium carbonate. According to nutrient
analysis, andezite minerals of this region and soils derived
of them have moderately rich mineral content.
Probably the oldest documents on existence of black mulberry
on our territory come from the last century (Strelka, 1984);
in 1839 Molnár in both "Fatenyesztés", in 1893 in
Journal "Gyúmelcsekertészet" and then in 1910 Szántó
Peter in publication "A begyés gyümöIcsök tenyntése",
in 1911 in Journal "Kiss kertész", in 1922 Szecsényi
-Wolkenstein in book "Törpe gyíimôlesfák ültetése"
all have named black mulberry with adjective "sour"
eventually sour "Spanish" or "Turkish".
J. L. Holuby "tutor" of Slovak botanists, correctly
determined Morus nigra from Pezinok as early as in 1910 (Zelený,
!985). Dr. Zelený has reported that probably the first one
who had directed attention towards this species was Jablonský
in 1936. This priority is however by Strelka (1984) problematic.
In 1947 Czech botanist Karol Domin obtained a fruiting twig
of black mulberry from Častá near Trnava, where this species
was called "tree raspberry" Domin (1948) after scrutiny
of obtained material and on the basis of obtained information
assessed that this species by its characters ranks to the
group of black mulberry. However at the same time he found
out that it showed some characters indicating red mulberry
(Morus rubra) but also other characters which differ it from
both mentioned species. So he got convinced, it was, to that
time a not described type of mulberry which deserved appreciation
as a new cultivated species. Putatively by its characters
it can be assessed that it generated from the crossing M.
nigra x M. rubra and that it is a hybridous species with certain
special characteristics. He named it: Trnavas mulberry - Morus
trnaviensis DOM. Later, thorough analysis proved that described
species was a typical representative of M. nigra L. which
Domin had not recognized. (Zelený and Grünerová, 1982).
The first who had directed attention to Domins mistake was
Kovalovský (1960) who on the basis of findings from German,
Polish, Soviet and English dendrological literature as well
as from key descriptions of Hungarian literature has stated,
that there reported systematic descriptions of black mulberry
(Morus nigra) are in accord with Domins description of Trnavas
mulberry (Morus trnaviensis). He claims that Trnavas mulberry
is no new Slovak species of mulberry but it is true Morus
nigra named by Linne. So name Morus Trnaviensis remains only
synonym for black mulberry distributed not only to Slovakia,
Czech and Moravia but nearly all over the temperate Europe.
Others who pointed at Domins mistake, were Pilát, Hrubý, Kamínek
M., Kamínek L. (Zelený and Grünerová, 1982). However Pilát
and Hrubý omitting preceding verifying of problem formerly
accepted M. trnaviensis and then immediately unscientifically
rejected (Strelka, 1984). Simultaneously with Domin, distinctness
of Trnavas mulberry was conducted by Prof. Dr. Novák who had
come to the same opinion like Domin did. Zelený (1985) has
however reported, that description of Novák brought no taxonomic
solution. Hybrid origin of M. Trnaviensis from M. nigra x
M. rubra L. is not likely, as M. rubra with its character
complex gets much closer to M. alba than to. M. nigra regardless
of great difference in chromosome number (M.rubra 2n=28, M.
nigra 2n=308). Benčať (1968) has reported it cannot be omitted
impact of the changed ecological conditions compared with
original area and selection although negative done by fruit
growers, what both could led to producing of particular new
properties not fully consistent with the type nevertheless
not such ones to be taken for species characteristics. As
the question is not yet definitively and satisfactory answered
in terms of current nomenclature of plants it is proposed
to accept its new name Morus nigra cv. Trnaviensis. Zelený
(1985) has assumed that comparison of Middle European populations
of M. nigra with Near East population is still not fully answered
question as from the latter region herbarium material is still
insufficient. Kamínek's brothers who in 50s thoroughly studied
so called Trnavas mulberry, had opportunity to compare growing
trees of M. nigra in some Arabian countries with those from
our county and they found no differences (Kamínek and Kamínek,
1968). Hence so far it is no use to consider Trnavas mulberry
for a cultivar of black mulberry.
As it can be seen views on origin of this mulberry differ
and one of them even admits it is a triploid form of Morus
nigra (Šimánek et al. 1977). Data on chromosome number in
taxa of genus Morus affirm that M. nigra is polyploid (Table
1). Black mulberry is a species with low diversity, cultivars
are not known.
Fruits of black mulberry are easy digcstible, refrishing.
eatable as natural or processed for stewed fruit, juice (sterilized
or not sterilized, thickened by sugar) less frequent for vine
(vinum moratum). As early as Old Romans imputed good digestive
and antitoxic effects to the fruits. At present fruits are
valued as moderate laxative and expektorative. To the decoction
from the dried leaves adstringent (contractory) effect and
control effect on blood sugar level has been imputed and therefore
has been recommended by diabetes and diseases of pancreas.
Chemical composition of fruits is as follows (in %) (Němec
et. al., 1958): water - 78, dry matter - 22, comprising sugars
- 18, organic acids - 0,85, mineral subsiances - 0.32 nitrogenous
compounds - 1.4, oil in seeds - 30.6 (computed from seed weight).
Vitamine content analyzed in 1 / mg.100g is as follows: vitamin
C - 3.8 (by Shall up to 20), B1 - 24, B5- 5,3, B6 - 1,5, Ieaf
acid - 450, Beta carotene 0.025; vitamin E (tocoferol) in
seeds 0,279%.
Of mineral substances it is especially important potassium
content which is in black mulberry up to 300 mg per 100 g.
Its shortage first of all is evident in elderly people and
has been manifested with weakness feelings, sometime with
hearth arythmic and often with higher blood pressure (Kresánek,
1977).
The most frequent and most proved way of propagation of black
mulberry used in Pukanec is layering eventually heaping. These
ways suit to trees which produce stool shoots near to ground.
All trees Pukanec black mulberry are own-rooted, what means
they originate either by layering or heaping (Zamboj et. al.,
1975). Another way o propagation is rooting of young suckers
growing from stump of cut tree. The suckers being heaped on
their basal part with soil easy root and after good rooting
can be separated from the mother stump. Various ways of propagation,
but especially propagation by graffing and budding have bean
in details reported by Kovalovský (1960).
Black mulberry is an perspective fruit crop for garden -
owners and fruit growers in climaticly suitable regions of
Slovakia. As there is still more interest of this fruit crop
among fruit - growers and admirers of this excelent fruit,
it would deserve much more attention than until now as regard
its cultivation, distribution but mainly conservation of present
old plantings at its historical localities.
Pilát, A.: Listnaté stromy a keře našich záhrad a parku.
Štát. zemédél. nakladatelství Praha, 1953
Strelka, F.: Niekoľko poznámok k Článku Dr. Zeleného, "Dreviny
z Čclede" moriišovjtých pestované v Československu".
Dendrologická sdélenŕ 30/1984
Šimánek, J. a kol.: Menej známe o'vocniny. Príroda Bratislava,
1977
Zamboj, J. a kol.: Pukanec. Pamätnica k 30- výročiu oslobodenia.
Osveta,n.p. Martin, 1975
Zelený, V.; Grúnerová, M.: Dreviny z čeledě morušovitých pestované
v Československu. Fólia dendrologica 8/1982
Zelený, V.: Odpoveď Ing.F.Strelkovi na jeho poznámky k článku
V.Zeleného a M.Griünerové: Dreviny z čeledč morušovitých pestované
v Československu. Dendrologická sdelenf, 1985
Contact address:
Ján Králik, Zd. Nejedlého 2, 934 01 Levice, Slovak Republic,
Ján Rosenberger, Nová ulica 2, 935 05 Pukanec, Slovak Republic
|